FRCP e-Discovery — Rules 26 / 34 / 37 + FRE 502 (privilege) · vFRCP (2015 e-discovery amen…

FRCP e-Discovery — Rules 26 / 34 / 37 + FRE 502 (privilege)

FRCP e-Discovery — Rules 26 / 34 / 37 + FRE 502 (privilege) — 75% covered.

4 requirements · 3 enforced · 0 designed · 0 advisory · 0 deferred.

Source: The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure govern discovery in US federal litigation. Rule 26(b)(5) governs privilege claims; Rule 26(g) requires an attorney to certify that every discovery response is complete and reasonable; Rule 34 governs production of electronically stored information (ESI); Rule 37(e) governs sanctions for failure to preserve ESI; and Federal Rule of Evidence 502 governs privilege waiver and clawback. KYE Protocol™ governs whether an AI-assisted privilege determination / production decision / discovery certification may PROCEED to a consequential litigation action — under a named supervising attorney's authority, with chain-of-custody recorded, with a signed Evidence Pack, and a contestability record so the determination can be reconstructed and challenged. KYE does not do the legal research, judge whether a document is in fact privileged, or render the attorney's certification judgment. · License: The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Federal Rules of Evidence are US government works in the public domain; KYE registry paraphrases each requirement's intent and cites the official rule identifier for mapping purposes only.

By category

CategoryReqsEnforcedDesignedAdvisoryDeferredCoverage
Named-authority on the privilege / discovery determination 1 1 0 0 0 100%
Discovery chain-of-custody for produced / withheld ESI 1 1 0 0 0 100%
Contestability & sanctions-reconstruction of the determination 1 1 0 0 0 100%
Substantive privilege judgment & attorney certification on the merits 1 0 0 0 0 0%

Every requirement → the KYE™ artefact that enforces it

IDTitleStatusKYE™ enforcement
frcp-ediscovery.rule26g-discovery-certification An AI-assisted privilege / discovery determination proceeds only under a recorded named-authority decision enforced audit_events: kye.purpose.request.v1, kye.purpose.admissibility.v1, kye.evidence.decision_map.v1
engines: internal, internal
rule_packs: kye:rule-pack:litigation-evidence-discovery
dictionaries: internal
constitution_refs: constitution/12-PURPOSE-PERMISSION.md
frcp-ediscovery.rule34-esi-chain-of-custody Produced / withheld ESI proceeds only with a recorded discovery chain-of-custody enforced audit_events: kye.evidence.decision_map.v1, kye.evidence.pack.v1
engines: internal
rule_packs: kye:rule-pack:litigation-evidence-discovery
constitution_refs: constitution/13-RESILIENCE-LOOP.md
frcp-ediscovery.rule37-sanctions-reconstruction Contestability & reconstruction of an AI-assisted determination for a sanctions / spoliation inquiry enforced audit_events: kye.evidence.pack.v1, kye.replay.context_seal.v1, kye.replay.proof.v1
engines: internal, internal
rule_packs: kye:rule-pack:litigation-evidence-discovery
constitution_refs: constitution/13-RESILIENCE-LOOP.md, constitution/21-DELEGATED-AUDITABILITY.md
frcp-ediscovery.substantive-privilege-judgment Substantive privilege judgment, document review on the merits, and the attorney's reasonableness certification out-of-scope (no enforcement cited)